15 April 2026                                Business Spotlight  |  Editorial Extra  |  News  |  Podcasts  |  About us  |  Home

Industry Guide


Archive




2011-06-16 DfT-002

Department for Transport

Chiltern Railway – penalty under S57A of the Railways Act 1993 (as amended)


keywords: click to search

Department for Transport




Words in [single square brackets] included hyperlinks in the original document

Words in [[double square brackets]] are editorial additions or corrections

Words in [[[triple square brackets]]] indicate embedded images or graphics in the original document. (These are not usually archived unless they contain significant additional information.)




< operators’ contracts index





Written statement


Department for Transport

Chiltern Railway – penalty under S57A of the Railways Act 1993 (as amended)


  date 16 June 2011
  source Department for Transport
  type Written statement

Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Norman Baker): I have decided to impose a penalty on Chiltern Railway of £350,000, having taken account of the outcome of a statutory consultation process.

The penalty relates to four breaches of the terms of the company’s franchise agreement which occurred before management of Chiltern transferred to Arriva UK Trains in early 2011. These involved late delivery of two station improvements, and two timetable changes which were not properly authorised by the Department for Transport and which could, if unrectified, have significantly reduced the value of the franchise to the Department. These breaches were in the context of the company’s poor performance in meeting a number of its detailed contractual obligations over a substantial period.

The Department imposes such penalties very rarely. When it does so, the aim is to encourage train operators to comply with their contractual obligations to the Department under franchise agreements. It should be emphasised that the penalty does not relate to Chiltern’s operational performance. As a number of consultees commented, the company is noted for its high standard of performance and customer satisfaction, and for the substantial investment it is making in improving services.

The penalty has been reduced from the proposed level of £500,000 in the light of the responses to the consultation, and in particular the welcome and clear assurances from Chiltern that it has stepped up its commitment and oversight at senior management level to ensure compliance with the terms of its franchise.

The receipts from the penalty will be retained by the Department and reinvested in transport. No decision has been made at this stage as to the final use of the funds.



Railnews Archive ::: 2011-06-16 DfT-002